Election '97: New anti-crime measures old hat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An undertaking to cut crime by 10 per cent during the five years of any future Conservative government, announced yesterday by Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, is a risky, possibly brave, but ultimately meaningless gesture.
In an attempt to seize the initiative on law and order - a surprisingly low-key issue in the election so far - Mr Howard outlined a five-point plan to reduce crime.
However, as opposition parties and pressure groups where quick to point out, there is nothing new in any of the Home Secretary's "initiatives". All five schemes have been well publicised and one was announced as long ago as 1995. What is new is the decision to cut the number of offences - standing at about 5 million in England and Wales in 1996 - by 500,000.
Mr Howard is gambling on maintaining the current drop in recorded offences, which have fallen by 10 per cent during the past four years. His optimism is not totally unfounded, although it is almost certainly based on the assumption that the less serious crimes of burglary and car theft will drop, rather than violent offences, which are rising.
By continuing to concentrate on crimes such as car theft and housebreaking, which make up 92 per cent of recorded offences, the police could bring the total down by 10 per cent. But there is evidence that the initial success of initiatives such as the Metropolitan Police anti-burglary Operation Bumblebee are starting to fade.
There is also the question of how police are going to reverse the rise in violent crime, which increased by 11 per cent last year. .It remains to be seen whether the introduction of a tougher sentencing policy against violent and sexual offenders will deter attackers.
Recent falls in crime have seen Labour turn its attack on the Tories' record, arguing that crime has doubled while convictions have fallen since 1979.
Paul Cavadino, chairman of the Penal Affairs Consortium, is also critical of setting a 10 per cent target. He argued: "Recorded crime figures do not always reflect real trends. For example, they can fall because demoralised victims no longer see any point in reporting offences to the police.
"The Home Office's British Crime Survey shows that such a fall in reporting accounts for part of the recent drop in recorded crime."
The assertion by Mr Howard yesterday that his plan is "entirely new" does not stand close scrutiny. His plan includes:
t Funding for 5,000 more police constables in the three years to 1999, a pledge made by John Major at the Tory conference in 1995.
t Computerised records of fingerprints and criminal files - which is already happening - and expansion of the DNA database - the police plan to do this, but are hampered by lack of money.
t Pledges of an extra pounds 75m for more CCTV cameras, faster justice, action on juvenile crime and tough minimum prison sentences are all in the manifesto.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments