Election '97: Labour hints at Lib Dem coalition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Speculation is increasing at Labour's campaign headquarters that if Tony Blair becomes Prime Minister on Friday, he will attempt to break the mould of centre-left politics by inviting one or two Liberal Democrats to join his government.
The suggestion resurfaced last weekend and has not been denied all week. Mr Blair said at one election press conference that while he believed in co-operation between parties, there was no question of pacts or deals. But his answer fell well short of a watertight denial.
When The Independent asked a leadership source yesterday whether there could be Liberal Democrat ministers in a Labour government, there was no attempt at denial or repudiation.
The appointment of Liberal Democrats to ministerial posts - presumably to the rank of minister of state - would be regarded by all Labour ministers and MPs as a signal of the influence of Peter Mandelson on Mr Blair.
Mr Mandelson said in an early synopsis of a book he wrote in 1996 with a founder of the Social Democrat Party, Roger Liddle, The Blair Revolution, that coalition with the Liberal Democrats might be necessary to enable Labour to stay in office for more than one term.
The draft said: "To see through the whole programme of renewal to completion will take more than one five-year Parliament and the Government will be facing re-election by a possibly sceptical or hostile public ... there is a strong argument for working out in advance what understanding Labour should forge with the Liberal Democrats."
The draft also said: "No doubt some in both parties would explode at the prospect of doing a deal. But the majority would prefer to see a longer- term, stable, left-of-centre government than a risky, short-term, go- it-alone attitude prevailing.
"The worst scenario would be to dismiss any idea of a pact, only to be forced to confront it later."
Lord Jenkins, the former Labour deputy leader and one of the Gang of Four SDP founders, was yesterday asked at the Liberal Democrat election press conference whether he had been involved in talks with Mr Blair over the future role of Liberal Democrats in a Labour government.
Lord Jenkins, who is known to be close to Mr Blair, said: "I have had no contact with him at all since what now seems like 18 months since the campaign began, and no discussions with him on this issue."
However, if it did happen on the back of a significant Labour majority many Labour MPs would be distressed by the construction of unnecessary coalition - not least because it would suggest a further erosion of the traditional Labour Party, and because it would mean fewer government places for Labour MPs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments