Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Election '97: Hamilton faces further pressure to step down

Sunday 13 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Supporters of Neil Hamilton are accused by his former associate Ian Greer of misleading Tatton Conservative Association to ensure the MP was re-adopted for the seat.

The warning by Mr Greer to the Conservative Association will put renewed pressure on Mr Hamilton to stand down, in spite of local Tory defiance at the challenge by the "anti-sleaze" candidate Martin Bell, a former BBC war correspondent.

Mr Greer's intervention in Tatton on the eve of Wednesday's deadline for nominations will dismay Tory party leaders who had hoped that the sleaze row would subside. It will harden attitudes in the local Labour Party and in the Liberal Democrats, who meet tomorrow night to withdraw their candidates to back the independent Mr Bell.

Mr Greer on Wednesday will publish his account of the cash-for-questions affair in a book, One Man's Word. In an interview in today's Times, he says: "Neil Hamilton had been asked by Michael Heseltine, who was then President of the Board of Trade, whether he had had a financial relationship with Ian Greer Associates. Neil Hamilton answered 'No'.

"Neil Hamilton received commission payments from my company on two occasions. It was the killer blow for the trial."

Mr Hamilton's supporters assured Tatton activists that Mr Hamilton would have won the libel action with Mr Greer, and cleared his name if the case had not collapsed. Mr Greer says such assurances were misleading - intended to bolster Mr Hamilton's chances of re-adoption.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in