Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: We should heed Ken Boston

Thursday 30 April 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government should heed the warning by Ken Boston that its new exams regulatory body, Ofqual, is in danger of having its independence compromised if it allows civil service "observers" to sit in on meetings. As he reveals, civil servants are prone to say things like "ministers would accept this" or "if I were to put this to ministers, I'd be laughed out of court". Such comments can influence so-called independent bodies in the kind of evidence they put forward. It is, however, a distressing trait of this Government that it tries to influence an "independent" review or body by, for example, defining the areas it can comment on. For example, it has told the primary curriculum review, whose report is due out today, that it cannot comment on the future of national curriculum tests.

The Government should welcome truly independent advice and have the courage of its convictions to ignoreit, if it disagrees with it. Relations between Dr Boston and the Government are at such a low that it is likely to disregard him. However, for four years , until last summer's SATs fiasco, he had an impressive record for modernising the examination system for which he was responsible.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in