Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Thinking matters

Thursday 23 April 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There should be less need for an independent school like Wellington College to appoint a thinker-in-residence to develop pupils' thinking skills than for a state school to do so. After all, Wellington is free from the national currciculum and can decide what it wants to teach for itself.

But the fact that Anthony Seldon, Wellington's headmaster, has done this shows how important one part of the independent sector regards the matter. At the moment the Schools Secretary Ed Balls is preparing to weigh up the report by an "expert group" into testing and assessment arrangements.

It would be foolhardy to suggest in these parlous economic times that money be devoted to appoint thinkers-in-residence to state schools but – as he grapples with the report – Mr Balls should have at the forefront of his mind the need to ensure a broader and more balanced curriculum, particularly in primary schools, as well as measures to ensure that coaching for the 11-year-old national curriculum tests is kept to an absolute minimum.

We can't continue with a system where just about every secondary school in the country questions the reliability of these tests and has to re-test youngsters the moment they transfer at the age of 11 as a result.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in