Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Brown's strategy needs a rethink

Thursday 26 June 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

No one can quarrel with Gordon Brown's national crusade to increase social mobility over the next decade. Several of the measures he announced in his lecture to the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust on Monday deserve support, notably the doubling in the number of graduates on the Teach First programme, which sends those with good degrees to teach in the toughest schools, and the expansion of nursery places for two-year-olds in the most disadvantaged areas.

Teach First has established a reputation for raising standards in inner-city areas and the nursery pledge, which first emerged when Brown was Chancellor, is a sound way to address the disadvantage. The trouble is that ministers are, once again, giving a mixed message to schools when it comes to helping those most in need. Take, for instance, the Government's much vaunted National Challenge – under which the 638 schools failing to get 30 per cent of their pupils to obtain at least five A* to C grade passes at GCSE including maths and English have been told they face closure unless they impress ministers with their plans for improvement.

The Government's declared aim is to lure more of the brightest teachers into tough inner-city schools. Yet nothing is more likely to put them off from applying to such schools than the thought that a school may close in the next year because of its low GCSE pass rate. Indeed, parents are going to be less likely to choose such a school for their children. No one objects to the idea that all schools should strive for the 30 per cent benchmark but threatening those that do not achieve it with closure – when many of them have been rated as outstanding by Ofsted, the education standards watchdog – is using too blunt an instrument to achieve your ends.

Gordon Brown's heart may be in the right place but he needs to rethink his strategy if he is to succeed. The truth is that some schools which only manage to get 30 per cent of their pupils to achieve the Government's benchmark are sometimes doing a better job than a grammar school which gets 90 per cent because its intake consists of the cleverest children – all of whom would be expected to get five good GCSEs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in