Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Balls must explain diplomas properly

Thursday 31 July 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, must be hoping his words of encouragement for the Government's flagship new diplomas do not return to haunt him. At the launch of the programme for 17 new diplomas, he was rash enough to say they could become the natural route for teenagers to progress through, thus replacing A-levels. Four weeks away from the first offering of the diplomas in schools, it looks like a rash prediction. The number of students taking them from this September has been scaled down from 50,000 to 20,000, the CBI has withdrawn its support from the three academic diplomas in science, humanities and languages which Mr Balls added to the programme and teachers' leaders argue that their members still do not know how to teach them or what their purpose is.

The government response is to say that those involved in September's diploma launch are quite clear about their purpose. But it acknowledges that more work needs to be done to bring the whole of the profession and all parents up to speed. That is all right as far as it goes. But with such a major reform of the qualifications system, it would have been better to make sure that everyone was au fait with the diplomas as soon as possible. Yet the National Union of Teachers is arguing that teachers' understanding of what is involved in the diplomas is patchy. It is therefore requesting a delay in implementing the second phase of the programme – when five more diplomas are added to the five launched next month – so that a proper evaluation of this year's pathfinder diplomas can take place. The union has a point.

Too often, governments have steamrollered through reforms at breakneck speed, leaving teachers, students and parents floundering in their wake. Witness Curriculum 2000 and the reform of A-levels. We would not have wanted the reform to be introduced in this way, because we preferred the model proposed by Sir Mike Tomlinson, the former Chief Inspector of Schools, for an overarching diploma covering both academic and vocational education. However, the diplomas crafted by Mr Balls are the only show in town now and it behoves ministers to be careful to get them right for the sake of the pupils.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in