Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Academics should check their facts

Thursday 17 June 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A pamphlet from the think-tank Politeia this week makes a persuasive argument for promoting Latin in primary school on the grounds that it can help youngsters master other subjects and learn other languages. Unfortunately, however, Politeia overeggs the pudding by suggesting that Latin is not in widespread use in primary schools because Labour banned it from them under its plans to promote modern foreign languages for children.

In fact, Labour did no such thing. It gave modest encouragement to the idea of a revival by encouraging the use of the comic strip-based Latin course called "Minimus" in the primary sector. Several schools are already using this course as a result. There is a tendency to adopt an "it is all Labour's fault" approach in the aftermath of the General Election – presumably in the hope that the Coalition Government will rally to the perceived ills perpetrated by the previous Government. Academics, however, should adopt a higher standard of accuracy in promoting their cause – and this Politeia report was written by two eminent academics. Indeed, one was the Oxford Regius Professor. Politeia could be knocking on an open door as a result of Education Secretary Michael Gove's desire for a more traditional curriculum. But we hope any decision he makes will be based on better evidence than this.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in