Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chalk Talk: How I found out that life in the fast set was not for me

Thursday 23 June 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last week's report from London University's Institute of Education, showing that streaming was starting to make a comeback in state primary schools, sent a frisson of horror down my spine.

I have to confess that I was myself a victim of streaming so maybe I have a personal axe to grind on the subject.

I was good at English and maths and therefore put in the top stream at my school before we even started to tackle the sciences.

I was hopeless at them – even to the extent of being forbidden to take my O-level in physics because I had done so badly in my mocks.

Plainly, what I really needed was the sympathetic ear of a teacher who could lend a helping hand to the scientifically illiterate so that I could at least get some grasp of the subject.

It was not to be. Streaming was presumably in existence at my schools because setting – whereby I could have been in a different set for different subjects depending upon my ability in each one of them – would have been too complicated for those who drew up the timetable to administer.

Whatever the reason, I was being taught by a science teacher who thought he had the crème de la crème in his classroom, and did not have the skills to cope with someone like me.

I have to confess I am not sure that mixed-ability classes at my school would have helped, either. It would have taken an extraordinarily dedicated teacher to make sure I kept up in class.

Maybe it is the administrative load associated with setting – a system advocated by both the previous government and the current one – that has seen the return of streaming in so many primary-school classrooms.

Whatever it is, I hope it will cease before it sentences a new generation of children to the agony of having to sit in a class where they do not understand what is going on – and where no-one takes the time to try and tell them.

A suggestion for our politicians to consider regarding their controversial tuition-fees policy came out of a seminar organised by Universities UK, the body that represents vice-chancellors, last week. Why not call it a graduate tax, as it is graduates who will have to repay the loans? The answer, apparently, is because it applies to overseas students and you cannot force them to pay taxes. Can you force them to repay loans, I wonder?

r.garner@independent.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in