The Campus Question: Should English universities move to four-year degrees based on the Scottish and US models?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lord Dearing: Author of the 1997 higher education report that paved the way for the introduction of tuition fees
Lord Dearing: Author of the 1997 higher education report that paved the way for the introduction of tuition fees
I don't think this is a good idea. English degrees are considered to be a high standard all over the world, as illustrated by the number of students coming from abroad to study here. We have had this system for many years. It is not length of study that should determine the standard of degree achievement.
Professor David VandeLinde: Vice-chancellor, University of Warwick
I agree there should be more flexibility in all our degree programmes to allow students the option of drawing elements of study from outside their core discipline. At the university I know best in the United States [Johns Hopkins], the degrees last for four years, but about 20 per cent of students complete in three years by taking more than the standard load of modules. We should examine how to provide flexibility throughout a degree programme rather than limiting it to a first-year option.
Dr David Eldridge: Director of American Studies, University of Hull
Our four-year degree students often get better results than our three-year students. For example, a recent class of four-year graduates jumped from an average of 58.8 per cent to 64.1 per cent in two years; the three-year students went from 58.6 per cent to 59.7 per cent in one year. Also, when our students experience the American style of education, they take the opportunity to broaden their studies and this has a positive effect on their careers. Classes in journalism, screenwriting and fashion design, for instance, give our students an edge in the job market.
Liz Cruickshank: Sandwich course student at the University of Manchester
As one of many people who postponed university, unsure of what discipline to follow, I would have preferred to have more options. The general election made me realise that I know embarrassingly little about our electoral system. Also, I am regularly stumped on subjects such as British geography or Shakespeare. It is depressing when a foreign student knows more about these subjects than I do because our degree programmes focus on depth, rather than breadth of knowledge.
Kat Fletcher: NUS National President
Students who do an extra year on top of their standard three-year degree programme find the experience extremely worthwhile both for their personal and professional development. However, while an extra year at university has the potential to equip the learner with added skills, knowledge and experience, it also saddles them with another year's worth of debt. When top-up fees are introduced in 2006, that could mean another £3,000 to pay off on graduation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments