Professor Ted Honderich: 'Palestinians have a moral right to terrorism'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Professor Ted Honderich is Grote Professor Emeritus Philosophy of Mind & Logic at University College London. He believes that we need to re-examine our attitudes towards terrorism and war.
Politicians talk about what's acceptable or legitimate. That boils down to what is right. Do we get what's right by going by democracy? The argument is that two heads are better than one, and more better than two. But that only works if what is in the heads gets equal and free expression.
In our hierarchic demo-cracies, the best-off tenth has around 1,000 times the political power of the worst-off tenth. And equality and freedom go together. If we are unequal because I have a gun and you do not, you have no freedom.
So we need a fundamental principle to tell us when democracy is right and which human rights to defend. For me that is the Principle of Humanity. Take rational steps to get and keep people out of bad lives.
It gives you a conclusion about neo-Zionism, Israel's expanding since 1967 into the last fifth of the Palestinian homeland. The Palestinians have a moral right in historic Palestine, including Israel, to their terrorism against that ethnic cleansing.
Is saying the Palestinians have this moral right just a defiant way of expressing sympathy with the Palestinians? It's more.
What is a moral right? It's something confirmed by the fundamental moral principle. Also, if you really have a moral right to some end, and only one means of getting there, you have a moral right to the means. Everybody believes the Palestinians have a right to a viable state.
Is there some better way than terrorism? I don't think so. Terrorism is necessary. They have no alternative. The idea that neo-Zionism would have given in without the threat of violence is nonsense.
The 9/11 attack was wrong. It was partly aimed at neo-Zionism, but it was an irrational means to that end. Our war on Iraq, a terrorist war because of lacking legality, is also condemned by the Principle of Humanity.
We keep hearing that terrorism is the intentional killing of innocents, and that the war in Iraq is not that. Well, to kill innocents intentionally is to act in the knowledge that their deaths will be a consequence. The test is accepted in every decent legal system and morality. It takes someone lacking in moral intelligence, like Blair, to think or pretend otherwise.
If Blair or another warmonger moves towards war on Iran, we should all be in the streets to bring him down.
Professor Honderich's latest book 'Humanity, Terrorism, Terrorist War: Palestine, 9-11, Iraq, 7-7' is available now from Continuum International Publishing, priced £12.99
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments