Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: The battle for Oxford continues

Thursday 03 November 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A number of college heads have been won round, including Dr Andrew Graham, the Master of Balliol. But most dons appear unimpressed. Their main concern seems to be that they will lose too much power to the vice-chancellor.

They agree that reform is needed; it's just that they don't like Hood's version. And a group have come up with alternative proposals, which were discussed at this week's meeting of Congregation, the dons' parliament. Instead of involving outsiders, they want a Board of Scrutiny of academics elected by dons to review the decisions of the university's managers.

All of which looks bad news for the reforming vice-chancellor from New Zealand. Far from agreeing with the Master of Balliol that the new proposals are an improvement, the dons seem to have been radicalised by their run-in with Hood earlier this year. Nicholas Bamforth, a law fellow at Queen's who helped to write the alternative proposals, says the new plan involves "disturbingly few checks and balances, making it just as difficult as it would have been under the Green Paper for ordinary academics to have any real voice in the government of the university".

When Hood arrived, he made it clear that he wanted to reshape Oxford to meet the challenges of global competition. That meant a clear strategy, structures that enabled decisions to be taken quickly, and getting a grip on the finances. However, he had reckoned without the dons. The two sides are in a bitter struggle about what makes a university great. The dons are convinced that their democratic, collegiate style of decentralised government will keep Oxford at the top of the international league table for teaching and research. We can only pray that they are right.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in