The Treasury's cleverly executed putsch of the research assessment exercise has left higher education open-mouthed Clearly the mandarins have lined up some important supporters among university vice-chancellors, but there are nevertheless a large number of sceptics. One is Oxford's vice-chancellor John Hood; another is Professor James Stirling, the particle physicist and fellow of the Royal Society, who is Durham University's pro vice-chancellor for research. The Treasury is going to have to do a lot of work to persuade them that a "tick box" metrics-based methodology is preferable to peer review. There is a danger that metrics would simply concentrate resources further in a few large institutions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments