Admissions Policy: Laura's legacy
The case of Laura Spence has prompted a new look at university admissions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The efforts by the Education Secretary, Charles Clarke, to persuade more universities to take disadvantaged students on lower A-level grades than better-off applicants has been boosted by a new report from Universities UK, the umbrella group of vice-chancellors. It should also please Chancellor Gordon Brown in his campaign to break down the bastions of privilege at Oxford, Cambridge and other universities.
Students who apply to university from low achieving schools should be given lower offers than applicants from more successful institutions, according to the study, even though some regard the idea as "an affront to concepts of fairness".
University admissions tutors should take other things into account as well as academic achievement, said the two-year study. They should look favourably on students who can demonstrate that they are well organised, able to work independently and have a real interest in their subject even though their predicted A-level grades may be too low to secure them an offer in normal circumstances.
The report was commissioned by the Department for Education and Skills after the case of Laura Spence, the Tyneside comprehensive school pupil rejected by Oxford University, fuelled concerns about admissions policies.
Although there is a widespread belief that high A-level grades are the best predictor of university success, the evidence to support that is "very mixed", the report says, echoing the views of Margaret Hodge, the Higher Education minister, who last year supported a Bristol University scheme that gives lower offers to good applicants from schools with poor A-level results.
There was increasing evidence that A-level grades alone were not the best way to judge school leavers' potential, Mrs Hodge said. Birmingham, Warwick, Newcastle, Nottingham and Cambridge are among the universities that already take some account of low performing schools in their offers to candidates.
'Fair Enough? Wider Access to University by Identifying Potential to Succeed', published by Universities UK.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments