Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Woodhead attacks levels of literacy and numeracy

Judith Judd
Wednesday 20 September 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Literacy and numeracy among job applicants, including university graduates, is worryingly bad, Chris Woodhead, the Chief Inspector of Schools says today.

Literacy and numeracy among job applicants, including university graduates, is worryingly bad, Chris Woodhead, the Chief Inspector of Schools says today.

In a letter to The Independent, Mr Woodhead, who heads the Office for Standards in Education, complains that, as an employer in central London, he is having difficulty recruiting numerate and literate staff.

"We have just interviewed 33 candidates for general administrative posts," he says. "All had GCSEs; 14 had higher education qualifications. Only six of the 33 passed the test in literacy and numeracy which is part of our selection process."

During the past fortnight, Mr Woodhead has called for an inquiry into GCSE and A-level standards and into the difficulty of degrees.

Last night, teachers' union leaders reacted scathingly to his latest attack on school and university standards. Doug McAvoy, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: "The relevance of Chris Woodhead is debatable. The relevance of his tests even more so. The unsuccessful candidates will be able to reflect on their good fortune."

But university vice-chancellors argued that they, too, were worried about undergraduates' maths and English standards.

Geoffrey Copland, the vice-chancellor of Westminster University, said: "It is a real problem for us. We do diagnostic tests and put in remedial work to make sure that students' literacy and numeracy are adequate for the course.

"Those problems are a reflection of the school system for which, I believe, Mr Woodhead has some responsibility. Some people are coming through to higher education who have poor standards of literacy and numeracy but who are intelligent."

Professor Alan Smithers, of Liverpool University, blamed teaching methods in the Sixties and Seventies for literacy and numeracy shortcomings among young adults. "The view was that attention to detail in communication and arithmetic inhibited imagination and excitement," he said. "Many of today's teachers went through primary schools while this approach held sway and many of them have a fairly shaky grasp of spelling and grammar."

A spokesman for Ofsted said that the literacy and numeracy tests were provided by specialist companies and were common to many employers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in