Top-up fees: How charges will alter the face of education
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Top-up fees allow universities to charge different fees for different courses. Universities could, for example, charge a lower fee for a science course that has difficulty in attracting applicants.
What are top-up fees?
Top-up fees allow universities to charge different fees for different courses. Universities could, for example, charge a lower fee for a science course that has difficulty in attracting applicants.
Why do universities need more money?
In the past decade, the amount of cash spent per student in the UKhas almost halved because of government cuts and an increase in the number of students attending.
How many universities will charge the full £3,000?
Most of the Russell Group - the country's 19 top research institutions including Oxford, Cambridge and the London School of Economics - is expected to charge £3,000 for all their courses. Professor Michael Driscoll of Middlesex University, the chairman of the Coalition of Modern Universities, which represents the former polytechnics, believes every university will charge the full amount.
Will any lower their fees from the present flat-rate £1,150 a year?
Research indicates that few will lower their fees.
What will it mean for a students from a poor working-class background?
He or she will receive a maintenance grant of £1,500 a year, have the £1,200 flat-rate tuition fee waived and be guaranteed a £300 bursary from his or her university. About 30 per cent of students will, therefore, pay no tuition fee.
And a student from a middle-class home?
He or she will pay more than at present if they go to a university that charges top-up fees. At present, they face an up-front fee of £1,120 a year. In future, they will pay back a maximum of £9,000 once they are earning more than £15,000 a year.
Will it help Tony Blair deliver on his promise of getting 50 per cent of youngsters into higher education by the end of the decade?
University lecturers and student unions say fear of debt will put a lot of youngsters off. The Government says students' financial position will be better and that other countries that have introduced top-up fees - such as Canada - have not seen a reduction in applications from less well-off students.
How will he achieve his aim of widening participation from deprived urban areas?
He plans to set up a new regulatory body, the Office for Fair Access. It will have the power to refuse universities permission to charge higher fees if they do not do enough to widen participation. Universities will have topay £300 bursaries to students from poorer backgrounds on courses costing £3,000 a year.
Will the measures create a two-tier university system?
A two-tier system already exists, with universities like Oxford and Cambridge being more sought after than others.
Will this buy off the rebels?
Not on yesterday's evidence. At least 100 MPs are believed to oppose variable top-up fees despite the latest concessions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments