Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

TALKBACK

Thursday 02 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Catherine Winzor Madam: Judith Judd ("Pupils fail to reach education targets", 24 January) says "in reading and arithmetic 20 per cent of seven-year-olds failed to reach the target of Level 2 or above ...". In his letter the following day Jeff Rooker says "the targets are the expected basics, not the norms".

This is not how the Government explains it in its circular 17/91, which states: "During each key stage teachers are required to teach with a view to pupils achieving levels of attainment within the ranges specified for that key stage. It is expected thatthe attainments of the great majority of pupils at the end of key stages will fall within the specified range of levels. The attainment of most pupils is likely to be at or close to the middle of the ranges." The range of levels specified for pupils in key stage one is from 1 to 3.

In the light of this I do not see that Level 2 can be seen as the "expected basic". It may be a target in the sense of an average we hope most children will achieve; it may be a level which, with effective teaching, an increasing number of children can reach, but it can never be the baseline of achievement for all six- and seven-year-olds.

Yours faithfully, CATHERINE WINZOR Headteacher Seascale Primary School Cumbria

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in