Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Surrey council failed to vet staff who were working with children

Education Editor,Richard Garner
Tuesday 12 August 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Britain's largest local authorities has been warned by inspectors that its lax procedures for vetting staff working with children are "unacceptable and dangerous", putting them at risk.

Surrey County Council has been criticised by Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, for giving inspectors "false" information about the effectiveness of its vetting procedures. "The poor attention to ensuring that staff are safe to work with children and young people is both unacceptable and dangerous," says Ofsted's report. It adds: "Although the council state in their self-assessment that all staff are robustly CRB [Criminal Records Bureau] checked, this information is false."

The danger to children at risk is exacerbated by a tendency for staff to place too much reliance on the word of parents, and, it adds, in "making the decision that no action is required by children's social care services" staff were too quick to close cases. "There are inadequate arrangements to ensure safe staffing across a range of agencies," it says. The authority is also criticised for a rise in teenage pregnancy rates.

A spokesman for Surrey County Council said: "Action has been taken to ensure all children are effectively safeguarded." All children in need cases had been reviewed. He added: "All staff within children's services who are required to have a valid CRB check either have one in place or are in the process of getting one."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in