Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Half of state-funded schools in England are paying too little attention to the way gender stereotypes influence subject choices, researchers have claimed.
Forty-nine per cent of co-educational secondary schools are strengthening the gender divide, with just 19% actively bridging the gap by explaining the universal appeal of typically "boy" or "girl" subjects, an Institute of Physics (IOP) study found.
The group analysed pupils' transition from GCSE to A-level, where students are invited to pick a small handful of subjects to study from age 16 to 18. Their research, published under the title Closing Doors, found gender bias in six subjects.
Maths, economics and physics are traditionally male-dominated and biology, psychology and English are favoured by girls, the report claims. In response, researchers suggested almost half of all state schools are doing too little to counter the stereotypical reputation of subjects.
Professor Peter Main, director of education and science at IOP, told the BBC: "What we're saying is schools should be doing much more to counter that gender stereotyping so that when pupils make their choices for A-level they do so with a level playing field.
"We're not saying pupils should chose subjects they don't want to do, but what we are saying is that schools should do their best to counter these gender-stereotyping effects.
"Forty-nine per cent (of schools) are making it worse, 81% are maintaining the national figures, so it's possibly even more severe. I don't think there is any school that's sitting down, saying 'Let's create gender stereotypes'. I don't think that's true at all.
"I think what is happening is that pupils are being subjected to external factors and schools are just not putting the effort in to counter these factors. A good start, in fact, would be for the schools to get their figures - to look at their own statistics - and set themselves targets that might work in future."
He added: "Schools that stop teaching at GCSE are much worse at countering gender stereotypes than those that teach A-level and continuing until 18.
"It's going to take whole-school initiatives to overcome these biases. We found that where a school is good at overcoming an imbalance in one subject, they are usually good at doing so in all the other five subjects.
"And, although the national picture is dismal, there is a silver lining in that some schools have demonstrated that they have been able to overcome these barriers."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments