'Satisfactory' schools must do better
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Inspectors will be banned from using the word "satisfactory" to describe state schools, the new chief executive of the education standards watchdog Ofsted says.
Instead, the one in three schools that currently receive the label will in future be termed "requires improvement". They will then join the list of failed schools if they do not improve within three years.
Sir Michael Wilshaw delivered the warning on the eve of a summit at No 10 which will discuss the fate of schools deemed to be "coasting".
Of immediate concern are about 3,000 schools labelled "satisfactory" in two consecutive inspections. Figures show that a third of secondary schools are labelled "satisfactory" after inspections. Grammar schools could also be told to sharpen up.
Under the plans, which will be subject to consultation, any school told that it "requires improvement" will face a second inspection within 18 months. If it still has not improved after three years, it will be added to the list of schools requiring "special measures".
Sir Michael said 700 "satisfactory" schools in deprived areas had subsequently been ranked "good" or "outstanding", which showed that it should be possible for all schools to make the necessary improvements.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments