'Pupil premiums' spent filling gaps
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Secondary schools are using money earmarked for the poorest pupils to paper over the cracks caused by Government spending cuts, according to a major report out today.
It warns that very little of the £1.25bn "pupil premium" allocated to schools for teaching disadvantaged pupils is being spent on ways to boost their performance. One in 10 schools were found to be using the money to plug the gap left by budget cuts.
The findings are a bitter blow for the Liberal Democrats, who view the pupil premium as the major concession wrung out of the Conservatives on education when they went into government with them.
The research, carried out by the respected National Foundation for Education Research for the Sutton Trust charity, is the most authoritative yet to examine the programme.
The Trust's findings show that less than 3 per cent of the 1,700 teachers surveyed said their school was spending the money on effective ways of improving pupils' performance, such as providing regular feedback. Instead, the money – which amounts to £600 for every child eligible for free school meals – was being spent on early intervention schemes (16 per cent) and reducing class sizes (15 per cent).
Sir Peter Lampl, chairman of the Sutton Trust, said: "If the billions of pounds allocated through the pupil premium are to genuinely help improve the results of poorer children, then we need to ensure that the teachers receive the best guidance on what works in the classroom."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments