Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oxford University boss attacks UK's immigration policy for harming academia

Professor Andrew Hamilton claims policy "baffles" him

Richard Garner
Tuesday 07 October 2014 17:08 BST
Comments
Professor Andrew Hamilton said the Government’s stance was having a harmful effect on the UK’s interests
Professor Andrew Hamilton said the Government’s stance was having a harmful effect on the UK’s interests (Rex Features)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The vice-chancellor of Oxford University has agreed that new Government visa controls are “hostile” to international students.

In his annual address to the university, Professor Andrew Hamilton said: “Whenever I travel in the world, particularly in China and India, one question persists. Why has the UK adopted a visa system so hostile to student entry?

“I do my best to answer but, frankly, the question baffles me as well. For the first time in decades, the number of international students at our universities has dropped, most markedly from India. Why are we doing this to them – and to ourselves?”

Professor Hamilton said the Government’s stance was having a harmful effect on the UK’s interests but said he had “limited expectation” that a real debate on higher education “as opposed to vainglorious point-scoring on past crimes and misdemeanours" would be on the agenda in the run-up to next year’s election.

“That’s sad,” he added, “because it is exactly the sort of issue on which a real effort to find a new meaningful consensus between the parties would be of immense benefit – benefit, of course, to the students and to the universities of the future.”

Professor Hamilton’s comments came on the same day as Nobel prizewinner John O’Keefe, a professor of neuroscience at University College London, voiced his concerns over the possible impact of Government immigration policy on scientific research in the UK.

Professor O’Keefe, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine on Monday, said: “The immigration rules are a very, very large obstacle [to recruiting scientists]. We should be thinking hard about making Britain a more welcoming place.”

In his address, Professor Hamilton also spoke out about why Oxford was against supporting the Government’s plea for its to sponsor an academy, saying: “We believe that our education expertise should be available to children across our city, regardless of ability or background.

“For all its success, this is not something the academy model can deliver. For that reason, there is no Oxford Academy.”

Instead, he said that the university was supporting a partnership with 11 state schools in the city linking its trainee teachers with local secondary schools in a scheme which “promotes collaboration among schools rather than competition between them”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in