Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ofqual rejects call for one exam board

Richard Garner
Friday 16 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Demands to establish a single GCSE and A-level board in the wake of claims that examiners tipped off teachers about questions were rejected yesterday by the regulator Ofqual.

A single exam board for the country was "not necessarily the solution" to what MPs called a crisis of confidence in existing boards, Glenys Stacey, Ofqual chief executive, told the Commons Education Select Committee.

Following The Daily Telegraph's allegations that examiners primed teachers about next year's papers at a series of seminars, there were calls from pressure groups – backed by Labour – to introduce a single examining body.

It was argued it would relieve boards of any pressure to woo schools by making papers easy and passing on tips.

But Ms Stacey said there had to be a market place "to incentivise a race to the top" and improve exam standards.

The committee of MPs also heard from three examiners who had been suspended following the furore. Two examiners apologised for their "inappropriate" comments but all three insisted that they did not reveal details of forthcoming questions.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in