New pupils at secondaries 'let down by teachers'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Up to 200,000 pupils every year are being let down by poor teaching in their early years of secondary school, the education watchdog Ofsted warned yesterday.
Up to 200,000 pupils every year are being let down by poor teaching in their early years of secondary school, the education watchdog Ofsted warned yesterday.
Too many children are allowed to "coast" or regress during their first three years at secondary school because of a "long-standing weakness" in the English school system, inspectors concluded in a report on the transition between primary and secondary school.
According to the report, called Changing Schools, secondary schools allocate their strongest and best qualified staff to teach GCSE and A-level students leaving 11 to 14-year-olds in the hands of the weakest non-specialists.
In his first press conference since his appointment as chief inspector of schools, David Bell criticised secondary schools' approach as "a false economy" for children.
He said: "Every year, 570,000 children move from primary to secondary school. It is a huge cultural change for children. It is frightening, it is exciting, it is bewildering but it is also a hugely important moment in children's lives in terms of their education."
Teaching in the first three years of secondary school was not as good as in the final year of primary school, he added.
Ofsted inspections had found that 74 per cent of lessons in the final year of primary education were good or better, compared to about two-thirds in the first three years of secondary schooling. Keith Lloyd, head of Ofsted's primary division, said that the dip in teaching quality meant some pupils who were motivated and well behaved at the end of primary school began to misbehave in the first year at secondary school.
He said: "Bad behaviour was almost always because there wasn't enough challenge and that comes back to what the teachers know and can do."
Teachers and the Government's political opponents reacted angrily to the criticism of school staff, claiming the unreliability of national tests was responsible for the apparent drop in standards.
The Secondary Heads Association blamed staff shortages for the difficulty in recruiting specialist staff. The Association of Teachers and Lecturers said "scapegoating" teachers was not the answer to the problem.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments