Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Letter: Inequity of 'Ivy League'

Your views

Jr Husbands,Leeds
Wednesday 23 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I have been reading with great interest the wide range of views held in relation to the proposed "Ivy League" of universities ("Combine or be doomed", Education+, April 17) and can clearly see the striking resemblance its proposal and the grammar/comprehensive school system.

Although I gained good A-level results, unlike the majority of my peers, I chose to study at a "new university" due to the particular course offered, and its excellent reputation.

However, now that I continuously suffer slanderous and offensive comments based on the snobbery of "old universities", I can sympathise with how my parents must have felt when they failed to get into grammar school in the 1950s.

The proposed "Ivy League" can only cause even greater inequalities between the two types of university, mirroring the huge gulf between grammar and comprehensive schooling.

Greater funding would increase the already substantial wealth of the "top" universities, whilst the rest remain underfunded and in continual decline.

Instead of greater funding for the privileged few, the money should surely be spent raising the standards of those institutions that receive criticism, resulting in high-quality further education for every university student.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in