Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: Speed up the marking

Thursday 29 April 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The integrity of A-levels is again coming under scrutiny in the run-up to this summer's exams. Reports are emerging of candidates in both state and independent schools predicted to achieve three As at A-level being refused university places.

The integrity of A-levels is again coming under scrutiny in the run-up to this summer's exams. Reports are emerging of candidates in both state and independent schools predicted to achieve three As at A-level being refused university places. Meanwhile, research by the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance exam board shows that if an A-star grade were introduced at A-level, the gap between what state and independent school pupils achieve would be even greater. This, in turn, is leading to dire warnings that independent-school parents will reach for legal action if their offspring are rejected in favour of state school pupils.

The growing controversy over A-levels is putting pressure on ministers to come up with a speedy solution to the problem. To restore confidence in the exam, they need to take action sooner rather than later, and certainly before they decide whether to give the green light to the Tomlinson proposals for shaking up secondary examinations. The former chief inspector himself believes it will take 10 years before his entire package of reforms is bedded down, so ministers would be wise to detach the problems with A-levels from all the other elements he recommends.

Head teachers' leaders and the exam boards have suggested one way round the problems. Individual pupils' marks could be passed on to university admissions officers. This would give a more precise measure of achievement and mean that the admissions people would be surer of their ground in sifting out the highest flyers for popular courses. Head teachers and the exam boards prefer it to the idea of introducing a new A-star or distinction grade which, they say, would devalue the grading system and put more stress on pupils. The problem is that, under the present system, marks become available only in August when the results are published and it is too late. So, this solution would have limited value at the moment. However if a post-qualification application system were introduced enabling young people to apply to university once they had their A-level results, the problem would not arise. We hope that the move towards more online marking by the exam boards - enabling results to be published earlier (and thereby giving pupils an angst-free summer holiday) - will make this much-needed change easier to implement. Over to you, Charles Clarke.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in