Leading article: Ruth Kelly made the right decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ruth Kelly has had an almost entirely unsympathetic press about her decision to pull her dyslexic son out of a state primary and send him to a private school that specialises in the condition. We decided to find out whether state primary schools are considered to do a decent job in helping children with severe dyslexia in order to understand her dilemma. The answer (see page 6) is that they aren't, which is why the experts are unanimously sympathetic to the former Education Secretary.
As the experts explain, children with serious problems in learning to read and write need one-to-one sessions with specially trained teachers every day. In most state primary schools they don't get that, and never have. They don't get it in most independent prep schools, but they do get it in independent specialist schools established to cater for dyslexia.
State special schools catering for slow learners are not the answer, for the simple reason that dyslexic children are often very bright. They are not slow, but they learn in different ways. Sending them to special schools for slow learners would probably be disastrous, as Karen Gold explains.
So to criticise Kelly for using private education when her local borough, Tower Hamlets, had a good reputation for special needs misses the point. Most special needs education does not cover education for dyslexics. This has almost entirely been left to individual head teachers.
The Government should act. It should ensure that primary school teachers are trained to detect and deal with dyslexia, because the current situation - in which dyslexic pupils are helped by teaching assistants - does not work. In addition, it should be possible for peripatetic specialist teachers to travel around to schools in a given area providing the intense intervention that severe dyslexics need. This has been done in the past for deaf pupils. Where possible - and it should be possible in big cities - specialist units could be attached to secondary schools to give dyslexic students the help they need.
The Government has made much of personalised learning - classes being tailored to the needs of individual children. This is an opportunity for ministers to show they are serious about it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments