Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: Parent power within limits

Thursday 19 May 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government has unashamedly moved towards more "parent power" in schools with the proposal in the Queen's Speech to allow parents to instigate school inspections. Ministers have also beefed up the powers of Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, by giving it the final say over whether a school that is failing should be closed, taken over by a new provider, or the management removed. In effect, therefore, they are giving parents the power to fire ineffective heads.

The Government has unashamedly moved towards more "parent power" in schools with the proposal in the Queen's Speech to allow parents to instigate school inspections. Ministers have also beefed up the powers of Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, by giving it the final say over whether a school that is failing should be closed, taken over by a new provider, or the management removed. In effect, therefore, they are giving parents the power to fire ineffective heads.

Parents will also be among those encouraged to set up new schools in the state system - alongside church, other faith organisations and private companies.

There is nothing wrong with giving parents who are worried about their children's education the opportunity to do something more concrete to put matters right. However, safeguards need to be inserted in any legislation to avoid the risk of a group of unrepresentative parents waging war against a head whom they particularly dislike - and creating instability in the school. Schools could be destabilised where there are disagreements over the wearing of religious dress in schools, for example, or over a liberal multicultural approach to the curriculum, in the event of a far-right group gaining support locally.

On the Education Secretary Ruth Kelly's intention to adopt a policy of zero tolerance towards indiscipline, we need to see more detail. It is important to know what her rhetoric means before we can decide whether the policy will work on the ground.

Head teachers are, of course, wary about conceding too much power to parents. As David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), said at the conference earlier this month, heads are worried that giving too much power to parents might be like "putting an alcoholic in charge of a bar". Their worries are that too many parents display a lack of responsibility and, in particular, that assaults on head teachers are increasing as a result.

On this subject, it is good to see Tony Blair and Ruth Kelly talking about the need to restore some respect in today's society - though it will take a little more than suggesting that offenders wear a uniform or that hoodies be banned from all shopping centres to really make an impact.

Dons' victory

Tuesday's historic vote by Oxford's legislative body, Congregation, to oppose the new Vice-Chancellor's proposals to review academic performance shows just how difficult it is to get change at Britain's ancient universities. Cambridge dons fought change during the reign of Sir Alec Broers; Oxford's academics have now done the same. One can see why they are so fired up. Until now, they have been able to dictate the content and method of their research. John Hood wanted to bring them into line with other research-intensive universities to ensure that Oxford does as well as possible in the research-assessment exercise. Tuesday's result means that he has failed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in