Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: Hard lessons of cities report

Thursday 05 June 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There is, it seems, still work to be done to convince some teachers that a pupil's background is not necessarily a deterrent to achieving excellence.

The report by Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, into the Government's two flagship inner-city initiatives - Excellence in the Cities and Education Action Zones - contains some food for thought for ministers, local education authorities and teachers alike.

As far as ministers are concerned, the inspectors showed particular appreciation for the more targeted approach of the EiC initiative - welcoming its success in reducing exclusions and improving attendance. Much of the credit for this is down to the employment of mentors who have helped to raise the self-esteem of disaffected youngsters. It also notes that the percentage of pupils getting at least five A* to C grade passes at GCSE has risen faster than the national average.

It is not so complimentary about EAZs, however, saying that in some areas standards have gone down instead of up. In addition, far from being the radical, cutting edge of education that they were trumpeted as, many have floundered through a lack of clear sense of direction about what they are trying to achieve. The scheme is yet another example of the fact that, while calling in the private sector to run education can work in some circumstances, it is not a panacea for improving standards.

As far as local education authorities are concerned, the report shows that some targeted funding from the top - for mentoring, for instance - can be beneficial. The findings are also an argument against a belief that seems to be developing that all initiatives should be put on hold for a year while the money used for them is diverted to paying teachers' wages and staving off redundancies. That would be short-termism in the extreme.

Teachers have some lessons to learn from the report, too. The EiC plans aimed at helping gifted and talented pupils show that - at least in the primary sector - they have provoked substantial resentment for being too élitist. Worryingly, too, ethnic minority pupils have been under-represented on projects and teachers in one in three schools continue to have unwarrantedly low expectations of what their pupils can achieve. There is, it seems, still work to be done to convince some teachers that a pupil's background is not necessarily a deterrent to achieving excellence.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in