Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Games: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 03 April 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Both North and South were a little optimistic in the bidding on this deal and an accurate defence led to a defeat of their game. Close analysis, however, suggests that there was a route to success, but that it would have been difficult to find at the table.

West opened 1NT, and after two passes South doubled. West and North were happy to pass, but East wisely retreated to 2!. With an awkward decision (he held undisclosed card values), South jumped to 34 and on the strength of his three trumps, a doubleton and an ace, North went on to game. Against Four Spades, West made the good lead of a low trump.

After winning in hand, declarer followed with the ace and another diamond. If West had failed to unblock, he would have had to win the second diamond and would then have been badly placed, unable to lead a second trump with safety, and with South obviously threatening to ruff two diamonds in dummy.

So, after careful thought, West played #Q under the ace and let the next diamond run to East. Now a second trump lead held declarer to nine tricks.

It was well defended, but can you see (double-dummy) a route to success? Suppose declarer crosses to 2A at trick two before leading a diamond from dummy. East must insert the nine (else South will play his eight) and West must unblock as before under the ace. Then a diamond back kills the defence, for if West plays low, South's #8 wins the fourth trick in the suit.

Game all; dealer West

North

48 7 2

!7 5 4 2

#10 2

2A 5 4 3

West East

4K 4 3 46 5

!Q J !10 9 8 6 3

#K Q 5 #J 9 7 6

2K Q 9 7 6 210 8

South

4A Q J 10 9

!A K

#A 8 4 3

2J 2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in