Flagship free school championed by Michael Gove told to improve
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A flagship free school praised by both Prime Minister David Cameron and Education Secretary Michael Gove has been told by inspectors it must pull its socks up and improve.
The verdict on the Greenwich free school in south east London comes despite high profile supporters including Tom Shinner, the vice-chairman of its governing body and the recently appointed director of strategy and performance at the Department for Education, and Jonathan Simons, head of education at the Policy Exchange think tank founded by Gove, who is co-founder of the school.
Mr Cameron said of the school: “This free school, like all others, is born of a real passion for education - a belief in its power to change lives.”
Mr Gove said free schools policy gave the green light “a group of teachers determined to prove that every child can succeed if given a classical liberal education, like the team behind the Greenwich free school.
However, the inspection report said: “Teachers do not ensure that students complete tasks to a high enough standard. Some work is untidy and written work is often too short and incomplete.
“Lower-ability students fall behind in some lessons because the teaching does not cater for its needs... In some lessons teachers do not set challenging enough work for the most able students.”
The inspectors praised the school’s record on the behaviour and safety of pupils, although they delivered a “requires improvement” verdict, one grade away from declaring it “inadequate”.
The school’s governors said they were “surprised” the report differed from the feedback it had received from parents and visiting educationalists but said they took the inspectors’ views “very seriously” and would respond to them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments