Extra funding designed to help poorest pupils failing to reach those in need
The Pupil Premium gives extra money to schools for each pupil they have who is in local authority care or who has been eligible for free school meals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Extra funding meant to help the poorest pupils under the pupil premium scheme is failing to reach those most in need, according to research.
A survey by the NASUWT teaching union has suggested that Nick Clegg’s policy, which gives schools up to an extra £1,300 for every disadvantaged pupil, could be getting swallowed up in general school budgets and not making it through to the classroom.
The research, which had nearly 2,000 responses from staff in England, found that over half (56 per cent) did not know where the extra funding was going, with many complaining that the money was not being spent on the pupils it was designed to help.
One said: “I fear that pupil premium funding is being used to prop up school funds.”
One teacher said: “I believe the way schools spend the pupil premium money should be closely monitored, as it appears it is not always used in the best interest of the child.”
Chris Keates, general secretary of the NASUWT, said: “Only when the professional opinion of those teaching the pupils is taken into account on how the funding can be most effectively used will real progress be made in closing the achievement gap for the most disadvantaged pupils.”
David Laws, the Liberal Democrat education spokesman, defended his party’s flagship policy. He said: “The pupil premium has meant £2.5bn extra going into schools – and in the hands of outstanding schools and teachers it is already making a real difference.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments