Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Exam chief quits after deadlines criticism

Richard Garner
Friday 05 October 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The chief executive of one of the country's largest exam boards resigned yesterday, two days after the board was criticised over marking standards.

Christina Townsend, chief executive of Edexcel, announced her decision after the company was named as one of three boards reported by headteachers to have failed to meet deadlines for re-marking contested scripts. John Kerr, currently director of operations at Edexcel, has stepped in as acting chief executive.

In statements yesterday, neither Dr Townsend, who has been head of Edexcel for eight years, nor her employers made any mention of the controversy. However, she described her last year at the helm as "a particularly demanding one".

Dr Townsend made it clear the Government's decision to introduce the new AS-level had led to much of the increased pressure on exam boards. The introduction of the new AS-level exam had meant a 50 per cent increase in the number of scripts to be marked and a 30 per cent increase in the number of examiners, she said.

"I am conscious that challenges remain and they will be need to be addressed in going forward," Dr Townsend said. "The time has come for a new chief executive to be appointed to strengthen and build on that foundation and for me to seek a new challenge."

She will take a short holiday before deciding on her future.

Earlier this week, the Headmasters' Conference (HMC), which represents those at top independent boys' schools, warned there had been a substantial increase in the number of appeals against exam grades this summer. It added that there were cases involving all three of the major exam boards failing to meet the 30-day "fast-track" deadline for re-marking a script. This had meant some students' university places had been put in jeopardy.

Geoff Lucas, secretary of the HMC, said quality had been sacrificed in an attempt to make sure results were delivered on time.

John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said of Dr Townsend's decision to quit: "This reflects the pressure on exam boards to improve the quality of their performance, which has too often been unsatisfactory in recent years."

Edexcel was forced to admit earlier this year that thousands of sixth-formers taking the Government's new Basic Skills test had had their papers marked incorrectly.

As a result of an administrative error, 6,466 students who had been told they failed their communication and number skills test were eventually given a pass mark; but 3,705 students who were told they had passed a technology paper had to take it again. The exam board, formed in 1993 in a merger between Btec and London Examinations, was forced to write to all the students whose papers were wrongly marked to apologise and set up a hotline for students and parents to ring for advice.

In addition to the controversy over marking standards, some schools complained that A and AS-level results from Edexcel had been delayed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in