Exam board admits adjusting marks to 'maintain standards'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The exam board at the centre of allegations that A-level results were "fixed" to avoid a massive increase in A grades admitted yesterday to adjusting the grading system in order to "maintain parity of standards". The Oxford, Cambridge and RSA examinations board conceded that it increased numbers of marks needed for a grade.
OCR said Dr Ron McLone, the board's chief executive, had intervened to "maintain parity of standards" with last year's results.
In a letter to John Bridges, head teacher at Wrenkin College in Shropshire, Mr McLone said this meant "striking an appropriate balance to ensure that, overall, the standards required at A-Level in 2001 were demonstrably carried forward into the 2002 A-Level awards.
"To achieve that, the A2 unit standards finally established had to be more demanding than those originally recommended by many of our awarding committees."
Wrenkin College had complained that its coursework marks for those sitting the English literature exam had been unfairly reduced. The board saidmarks for coursework in English, one of the subjects supposedly affected,were higher than in written papers.
Meanwhile, worries about exam results and success at school have replaced bullying as schoolchildren's biggest fear, according to findings in a survey released today.
The poll of pupils aged seven to 16 revealed that 46 per cent were more concerned with doing well at school than with anything else. Bullying was the third biggest fear, with 40 per cent citing it as a big worry. In second place was exposure to the dangers of drugs or alcohol.
Parents' leaders said the survey, run by RM, a supplier of technological equipment to schools, underlined how much pressure was being put on schoolchildren by the Government's testing regime. Margaret Morrissey, a spokeswoman for the National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations, said: "It is sad to think that all the pressures are having such an impact on today's children. It ... shows that children have lost something that we should cherish dearly their childhood."
In previous responses to the annual survey, more than two-thirds of pupils had cited bullying as a major concern.
Education experts said the findings might be a sign that the Government's anti-bullying drive was paying off. Gill Evans, an educational psychologist, said the findings raised another question: "Can a certain degree of worry about doing well at school act as a positive stressor that enhances school performance?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments