Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Education Letter: The real problem with RAE

Opinions on girls and science, literacy and numeracy tests, Chris Woodhead, the role of research, and falling academic standards

Keith Flett
Thursday 11 February 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AS AN historian I am a firm believer in research - an engagement with original sources - wherever possible. However there is research and research. The Research Assessment Exercise is not really about stimulating worthwhile research, it is simply a crude attempt at a productivity measurement.

What Lucy Hodges' article on the RAE (Education, 28 January) rather skates over is the adverse impact it is having on genuine research. As the organiser of a regular socialist history seminar at the Institute of Historical Research in London I aim, of course, for maximum academic rigour. At the same time, I also want to encourage non-professional academics to participate since, particularly in the field of labour history, they have an enormous amount to contribute from their own experiences and researches.

I find myself in a constant struggle to retain the integrity of such a seminar against the demand that papers given must always be able to be refereed and published as soon as possible. I am very much in favour of publication, and no slouch at it myself. I am also willing to allow that those who rarely or never publish may also have an enormous amount of interest to contribute.

KEITH FLETT

Convenor,

London Socialist Historians Group

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in