Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Colleges forced by budget cuts to promote ‘bums on seats’ courses that are ‘low-value’, Ofsted says

‘If they put on a popular course that will get them funding in’

Eleanor Busby
Education Correspondent
Wednesday 16 January 2019 21:52 GMT
Comments
College students and principals march on Westminster last year over funding cuts
College students and principals march on Westminster last year over funding cuts (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A lack of government funding for sixth forms and colleges is prompting principals to prioritise courses just to get “bums on seats” rather than helping pupils’ future prospects, Ofsted says.

Amanda Spielman, Ofsted’s chief inspector, has said that real-terms cuts to post-16 funding have affected “quality” in the system and the overall student experience.

Some colleges are pushing popular courses, such as level two arts and media courses, to boost student numbers and pupil funding, rather than courses which will lead to a job, the watchdog says.

Sean Harford, Ofsted’s national director of education, told The Independent: “One of the reasons that post-16 providers in some cases promote certain courses is to get bums on seats, which increases their funding to paper over the cracks.

“They know that if they put on a popular course that will get youngsters in then that can get them funding in. That is the kinds of things we are seeing.”

Speaking at the launch of the new inspection framework, Ms Spielman said that “getting the fees” by promoting “low-level” courses is taking priority among some colleges amid funding constraints.

“It is clearly an intense market for colleges as there is a lot of movement at age 16,” she added.

Ofsted’s proposed new framework will mark down colleges and school sixth forms that have a limited range of courses on offer, as the focus will shift to the curriculum rather than exam results.

In her speech to the Sixth Form Colleges Association on Wednesday, Ms Spielman said: “One other thing that I hope will flow from this new approach is that integrity will be properly rewarded. That inspection will recognise the importance of doing the right thing by young people.”

Recent analysis from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) revealed that funding per student in sixth forms has fallen by more than a fifth (21 per cent) per student since 2010-11.

Meanwhile, funding per student for 16 to 18-year-olds in further education has fallen by 8 per cent in real terms over the same period.

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “It is unfair to say that colleges or schools are adopting a ‘bums on seats’ approach in response to this crisis.

“The reality is that headteachers and principals are doing their absolute best for their students in extremely challenging circumstances and are offering courses which they believe will give these young people the best chance of onward progression to higher education or careers.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in