Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Change to degree grades rejected

Tim Ross
Friday 10 November 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

University leaders have rejected plans to abolish the existing system of degree classifications, despite a major inquiry concluding it is "not fit for purpose".

A task force led by Professor Robert Burgess recommended that firsts, 2:1s, 2:2s and thirds should be replaced with a simple "pass", "fail", or "distinction".

But the idea was too radical and lacked the necessary support among vice-chancellors, the umbrella group Universities UK said.

Instead, one option being considered is to add a new grade within the current 2:1, to help employers distinguish between the 40 per cent of all graduates who get upper seconds.

A spokesman for Universities UK said the pass, fail or distinction proposal had not won enough support. "There is a general acceptance that neither employers nor the [university] sector is ready for such groundbreaking change. People know what a 2:1 is.

"But the argument is that there are too many people with 2:1s, from an employer's point of view," he said.

Wes Streeting, from the National Union of Students, told the Times Higher Education Supplement: "Everyone seems to agree that the classification system is out-dated. But, as ever, there is no consensus about what should replace it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in