Cambridge University: The interview questions that are stranger than fiction
'If a wife had expressed distaste for it, would her husband’s habit of putting marmalade on his egg be grounds for divorce?'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Stories of the oddball questions asked at interviews by Oxbridge academics abound - and sometimes fact is stranger than fiction.
For instance, how would you answer the question asked of one would-be undergraduate: “Are you clever enough?”
Then there is the question asked of PPE applicant at Oxford: “If there were three beautiful naked women standing in front of you, which one would you pick? And does it have any relevance to economics? (Pictures of the women were supplied).
Budding lawyers seeking a place at Cambridge were also asked: “If a wife had expressed distaste for it previously, would her husband’s habit of putting marmalade on his egg at breakfast be grounds for divorce?”
Would-be veterinary science students at Cambridge were asked: “Is the moon made of green cheese?"
Of course, the apocryphal stories that do the rounds about interview questions can be more absurd such as the suggestion that at St Edmund Hall in Oxford tutors threw a rugby ball as students walked into the interview: if they caught it they got a place and if they threw it back they got a scholarship.
Another tells of a student who was asked by his interviewer: “What is courage?” He replied: “This.” and promptly left the room. He was given a place for his nerve.
The last two questions have been dismissed as “myths” by academics who are anxious to stress the integrity of the interview process - and say the questions are not supposed to be a test of knowledge but an opportunity to reveal students; potential.
Last year Oxford published details of some of the questions that had been asked if last year’s applicants - such as “should there be a cap on bakers’ bonuses?” and “can archaeology prove or disprove the Bible?”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments