Cambridge may sue consultants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cambridge University is considering legal action to get compensation from consultants who helped it to introduce an allegedly disastrous computer system that wasted £9m.
A two-part independent report recommended "immediate and forceful steps" be taken to see if compensation could be obtained from the consultants. But KPMG, one firm involved, has also said that is may take legal action against the contents of the report.
The "Capsa" computer system, introduced 15 months ago after almost four years of planning, had brought the univers-ity to a virtual standstill, with staff unable to access research grants or pay salaries and bills.
Oracle, a American software supplier, had provided a "poor quality" product while KPMG had "made a series of serious mistakes", the report said.
But it also found that the university, which has a £350m turnover, was incapable of accounting for its money.
The university refused yesterday to name the companies it intended to pursue.
A spokeswoman for KPMG Consulting said: "We believe that both reports contain a number of serious inaccuracies. We are now actively considering the contents of the reports with our legal advisers."
Oracle said that it was still working with the university and that client confidentiality prevented it discussing the case.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments