Budget 2013: Headteachers sceptical about claims that schools cash is protected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Headteachers were last night sceptical about claims by the Chancellor that the schools budget would continue to be ring-fenced.
They pointed out that the protection only applied to schooling up to the age of 16 and did not cover education for 16 to 19-year-olds.
As a result, school sixth-forms and colleges were already being "seriously squeezed" and being forced to cut courses.
Malcolm Trobe, deputy general secretary of the Association for School and College Leaders, said: "We welcome the confirmation in today's budget that school funding will be protected but this is somewhat misleading in that it only applies to education to age 16.
"Options for 16 to 19-year-olds are being seriously squeezed by funding cuts and we have already warned that many school sixth-forms and colleges will be forced to cut the number of courses on offer. In the long-run small sixth-forms could become unviable but even large sixth forms and colleges will face difficult decisions."
He added: "It is a fact that funding for 16-19 study will be significantly for lower for pre-16 and much lower than funding that succeeds it in higher education, The 16-19 funding dip is a growing and unwelcome anomaly. Given that the education participation age is rising to 18, this is a worrying trend."
Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, added: "Schools and colleges have not been 'protected' as the Government claims but have suffered significant real term funding cuts."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments