Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Oh dear! I shall have to give up offering well-meant advice and stick strictly to reporting facts. This deal produced a peevish letter from a correspondent.
The bidding was simple: South opened 2NT and North raised to game. West led 44 against 3NT, obviously following my recent suggestion that the lead of a 10 against a no-trump contract implied a strong suit with two higher honours. Dummy followed with the six, and East (who had clearly noted my other recent point that, rather than make an apparently useless attempt with near garbage in partner's suit, it was more useful to give a count) thoughtfully played the two to suggest a three-card holding.
When 46 won, declarer still had two guards in spades and he attacked clubs. Now it was too late for the defenders to get a long card in any suit working and they came to only the four obvious tricks: a spade, a diamond and two clubs.
Yes, the lead of 410 defeats the contract when West ducks his partner's next spade return. Yes, East could have done everything that was necessary by covering S6 with his seven at trick one after which, again, West ducks the next spade return.
But the real culprit of the hand was declarer! Why? He really should have tried 48 from dummy at trick one - a play that could hardly cost and would have provided an unexpected third stopper in spades.
Game all; dealer South
North
48 6
!Q 10 5
#10 7 6 3
2K 8 6 5
West East
4A 10 9 4 47 3 2
!9 7 2 !8 6 4 3
#8 5 2 #A 9 4
27 4 3 2A Q 2
South
4K Q J 5
!A K J
#K Q J
2J 10 9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments