Backgammon
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
When deciding whether to take a double, the basic rule is that you must expect to be able to win 25 per cent of the games. That figure is valid only in cases where you do not expect to lose many gammons, but let's not complicate things for the moment. Because the next roll after a double is usually crucial, a good way to evaluate a position is to look at a cross-section of 36 games (the number of possible dice rolls) and estimate whether you can win nine of them.
Take this position from the recent Biba tournament at Brighton. Double Fives aficionado Julian Fetterlein was playing White against a weaker player when he ventured a double. His opponent should have reasoned as follows:
"How many games out of 36 can I win? Julian has a direct shot at a blot which, if he hits it, would guarantee winning the game and maybe a few, but not very many, gammons. So he has 17 good numbers (all 6's, 22, 33, 42, 24, 51, 15). But what of the race? Before the roll I lead 91-100. If Julian doesn't hit the shot the race is likely to be about even with me on roll. On nine of his numbers (11, 12, 21, 13, 31, 14, 41, 23, 32) I will get a shot at his blot, and he still has a man trapped in my board. "Of the 19 numbers where Julian doesn't hit my blot I am a substantial favourite, especially as I own the cube. I estimate that I could win 14 or 15 of those 19 games. I only need to win nine games to be able to accept the double, therefore I take."
Sadly for him, his reasoning went awry and he dropped, the fear of the direct shot dominating his thinking. Full marks to Julian for an aggressive double which paid dividends. It is only by evaluating the position methodically that you can reach the correct decision. Jellyfish, incidentally, evaluates the position as No double/ take, preferring to double out its opponent if it hits the shot.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments