Editor denies `malicious crusade' against Tories
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peter Preston, editor of the Guardian, yesterday rejected accusations that a front-page article about Conservative Central Office's handling of donations from the fugitive Asil Nadir was "sensational, anti-Conservative scandal-mongering".
He told a High Court libel jury that "to be thought to be acting maliciously against the Conservative Party would be barmy". it would put off a lot of Guardian readers and cut off the paper's relationships with the government of the day and the Conservative Party.
He denied that the newspaper was engaged in a "malicious crusade" against the Tories.
Mr Preston, shortly to become the editor-in-chief of both the Guardian and the Observer, was giving evidence on the third day of a libel action brought by the Tory party's director-general Paul Judge, 45.
He is suing Mr Preston, the journalists Paul Brown and David Pallister, and Guardian Newspapers, for damages for the harm he says has been done to his reputation by the September 1993 article headlined "Tories face court over Nadir cash - Central Office `tricks' obstructing inquiry".
The hearing was adjourned until today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments