Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Duo's nude art advert upheld

Marianne Macdonald Media Correspondent
Wednesday 10 January 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MARIANNE MACDONALD

Media Correspondent

The debate over nudity in advertising - and art - reignited yesterday when the Advertising Standards Authority refused to uphold complaints that Gilbert and George's The Naked Shit Pictures were offensive.

The ageing duo's controversial exhibition last August at the South London Gallery featured 16 enormous photographs of excrement and pictures of the artists naked, one showing their anuses.

It was promoted with an advert showing a full-frontal nude photograph of Gilbert and George in both Time Out, the London listings magazine, and The Big Issue, which campaigns for the homeless.

Unfortunately, the explicit picture attracted the ire of the home counties - Hampshire and Berkshire, to be specific - where two complainants objected to the title of the exhibition and to the advert for it.

The ASA did not uphold their complaints. "The advertisers believed that nudity, a recurrent theme in artistic expression throughout the history of art, was not generally thought offensive," it said.

"They said the title of the exhibition was included in the advertisement partly to reflect the type of art on show, which pictured naked people and excrement."

Ironically, the finding could be viewed as a defeat for the pair, who for years have tried to shock the art world and the public. This has led them to the public lavatory, and associated images of masturbation.

A second ASA ruling criticised Berlei for suggesting sports bras could prevent breasts drooping in later life. Its advertisement asked: "If you don't wear a Berlei sports bra what shape will you be in?" and featured an illustration of a skipping rope shaped to outline a pair of sagging breasts.

Twenty complainants argued that the illustration was offensive and that the sports bras could not prevent drooping in the long term.

Although the advertisers submitted a survey showing that 80 per cent of GPs agreed that sports bras could alleviate drooping breasts, the ASA said there was insufficient evidence.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in