Drunk man run over while lying in road can sue driver for damages
Samuel Cameron was run over by a bakery delivery driver while he lay intoxicated on a street in 2016
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A man who was run over while lying drunk in the middle of the road can recover damages, an appeal court has ruled.
Samuel Cameron was driven over as he lay intoxicated on a street “apparently asleep” in Paisley, near Glasgow at around 5am on 23 April 2016.
Martin Swan, a bakery delivery driver, had been overtaking a taxi and is said to have failed to see Mr Cameron despite street lights being on.
Mr Cameron suffered multiple fractures to his skull and body after being run over and in 2019 launched a legal action for a six-figure sum against the driver.
A previous decision dismissed a motion for interim damages but on Thursday, the Innercourt House of the Court of Session ruled that legal action should not have been refused.
The ruling said: “On the evidence before him, the first defender had (as he himself accepted) an unimpeded view along the off-side of the taxi as he approached the locus where the pursuer was lying.
“He failed to see him as he lay on the road. That is prima facie evidence that he failed to keep a good lookout. A driver has a duty to take reasonable care for other persons using the highway; even persons who are lying on it in a drunken stupor.
“The first defender had a duty to take reasonable care to keep a good lookout on the road ahead and not to overtake other vehicles unless it was safe to do so; that is when the road could be seen to be sufficiently clear. He did not do so.”
Mr Cameron’s lawyer, Stuart Barton, welcomed the decision saying: “For the last few years Mr Cameron has shown great strength of character during his recovery as his injuries had a truly life-changing impact.
“We therefore welcome this judgment as it will help provide our client with more opportunities to access the rehabilitation, support and future he deserves. Today’s ruling is indeed a significant and positive milestone but the civil action is still ongoing so it would be inappropriate to comment further.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments