Driving over the bridge to Skye
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The controversial Skye Bridge was given a clean bill of health in a report by the National Audit Office published today.
The bridge, opened in 1995, was one of the first schemes to be completed under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI). The project is estimated to have cost the Department of Transport pounds 15m, more than anticipated, but thanks to the use of PFI, the bridge was built much earlier than if it had been funded conventionally through the public purse. There have been widespread protests at the tolls - pounds 5.40 for a car in high season - but the report says the fares are lower in real terms than those for the ferry from the Scottish mainland to the Isle of Skye which the bridge replaced. The report also finds that since the contractor, Miller-Dywidag, will recoup its investment within 14 to 17 years, the concession will revert to the Government.
5 National Audit Office, The Skye Bridge: pounds 10.75 Christian Wolmar
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments