Doctors fearful of scientific fraud
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A national body to oversee scientific research and investigate allegations of fraud is urgently needed in the UK, leading medical editors said yesterday.
Patients had been harmed and the credibility of scientific institutions damaged by cases in which results had been falsified, signatures forged and research plagiarised.
Speaking after a conference on research misconduct held in London, organised by the Committee on Publication Ethics, Dr Richard Smith, editor of the British Medical Journal, cited a dozen new examples in which misconduct had been proved or was under investigation. They included cases in which signatures of patients giving consent for research to be done on them had been forged, consent from hospital ethics committees to do research had been forged and signatures of co-authors such as a head of department had also been forged, to give the findings more weight.
One editor had told the conference how he had rejected a paper claiming to describe a cure for pre-eclampsia, the life-threatening condition associated with high blood pressure in pregnant women, which he suspected was fraudulent. A straw poll among the 130 present at the conference showed more than half of editors had had similar experiences.
Pressure to publish is intense because it is the only way scientists can gain promotion, grants and laboratory space. Dr Smith cited the case of Malcolm Pearce, the obstetrician struck off the medical register in 1995 for falsely claiming to have successfully removed an ectopic pregnancy and re-implanted the foetus in the patient's womb who later gave birth to a healthy baby.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments