Docks scheme pounds 193m in red
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UPGRADING BRITAIN'S Royal Dockyards is pounds 193m overspent and up to six years behind schedule, a damning Commons report has found.
The all-party Public Accounts Committee concluded that poor Ministry of Defence management had led to major delays to the refitting projects for nuclear submarines at Rosyth and Devonport.
The delays were so serious they risked jeopardising the operational capability of the Royal Navy's most expensive fighting machines.
In the report published yesterday, MPs also found that taxpayers had lost a further pounds 20m because the last Tory government sold off the yards cheaply. There was no competition for the privatisation, MPs found, with contractors Babcock Rosyth Defence and Devonport Management the only bidders for each site.
MPs described the overspend on refurbishment as "wholly unacceptable". Even though the yards are privately owned, the MoD is paying to upgrade their facilities to ensure that nuclear submarines can be adequately refitted. But overspending had been "massive", totalling pounds 193m, equivalent to a rise of 57 per cent on the original estimate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments