Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Disney reels back on family fare

Tim Cornwell Los Angeles
Monday 17 June 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Young Americans - that maddening band of consumers whose tastes dominate all our lives - are so turned off by cosy Disney films that the corporation has decided to halve its annual film production.

Instead, Disney will channel all its energy into the kind of high-budget blockbusters that would leave Bambi bleating far behind.

Joe Roth, Disney's chairman, indicated that the company will shed formulaic and often unprofitable family fare for "event" films that carry bigger stars and touch on more adult themes.

Even its own stock-in-trade are up for re-invention: a 101 Dalmatians remake scheduled for release this autumn will feature Glenn Close as Cruella de Ville (she, of course, is best remembered for boiling pet rabbits, rather than cuddling them).

Disney's hand appears to have been forced by Hollywood's love affair with "event" films this summer, such as Twister, and Mission Impossible, where massive promotion and star power is used to turn pictures of questionable quality into must-see extravaganzas.

While Disney's animation department has produced a string of huge blockbusters in the 1990s, its live-action films have fared poorly. Studio executives have been left looking jealously at big hits that have reached family audiences with a more modern feel - like the cross-dressing Mrs Doubtfire, or the anarchic Home Alone.

The Lion King, released in 1994, brought in $300m (about pounds 194m) at the box office alone and estimated profits of some $1bn. Other animated films, such as Aladdin and Toy Story, have been huge cash cows.

By contrast, Disney's live-action department is thought to have lost $200m between 1992 and 1994, and though it may have broken even last year is expected to sustain some expensive write-offs in 1996.

Mr Roth said that he did not see "the economics justifying 40 pictures a year".

Disney's biggest success of the summer has itself been an "event" film, The Rock, about an assault on Alcatraz, starring Sean Connery. Released by Disney's Hollywood Pictures, it's non-stop action is meaty stuff.

The corporation is also seeking to hire Robin Williams for another star vehicle, a remake of the 1960s film The Nutty Professor.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in