Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dismay over pupil selection

Donald Macleod,Education Correspondent
Friday 30 October 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SCHOOLS are being advised by the Department of Education that they are free to select about 10 per cent of their pupils on the basis of ability in music and art or sport. The new policy led David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, to accuse ministers yesterday of introducing selection into comprehensives by the back door.

It surfaced in a letter from an official at the Department of Education about a school in the London borough of Bromley. The official said that if the school wanted to select pupils on the basis of their ability in conventional academic subjects, that would amount to a significant change in the school's character and would need the specific approval of the Secretary of State.

He added, however: 'On the other hand, we take the view that the introduction of a degree of selection on the basis of ability in aesthetic subjects or sport need not be the subject of statutory proposals, provided that the proportion of places at schools allocated on this basis is no more than about 10 per cent.'

Critics argue that that will give middle-class children an advantage in seeking entry to popular schools and enable a school significantly to alter its intake. Mr Hart said yesterday: 'It will begin to pull the rug from under the comprehensive system. It is not just the individual school, but the impact that it will have on other schools or local authorities.

'It would reinforce all the fears of many of us, that the Government's policies will lead not to an extension of parental choice but a selection of pupils by schools.'

John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, wants schools to specialise in particular areas of the curriculum, so that they develop a reputation for excellence in, say, music, or in technology.

Martin Rogers, co-ordinator of Local Schools Information, the opting-out advisory body, said: 'As more schools opt out, it is increasingly difficult to monitor admissions policies and practices to ensure that children are treated fairly. Any relaxation of the rules can only make this worse.'

A department spokesman said that local education authorities have always had the flexibility to allow a small proportion of pupils to be selected for their talent in music, art or sport. But the Bromley letter suggests that Mr Patten will now encourage schools to select a share of their pupils as part of his specialisation policy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in